Debt Stress and Debt Illusion: The Role of Consumer Credit, Reverse and Standard Mortgages.

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the relationship of debt stress and reverse mortgage borrowing and compares it to stress from standard mortgages and consumer debt. Debt stress is measured as a self-reported response to the amount of debt. METHODS: Using a unique national data set of 1,026 homeowners who chose whether to obtain a reverse mortgage in 2010, we estimate the relationship of 2014 levels of debt stress with various types of debt, assets, and income. Using an ordered probit model, we address the endogeneity of our measures of mortgage and consumer debt using an instrumental variables regression model. RESULTS: We found that consumer debt causes more stress per dollar of debt compared to mortgage debt. Reverse mortgages cause a relatively low level of stress per dollar of debt compared with standard mortgage debt. The average treatment effect of originating a reverse mortgage indicates statistically significantly higher probability of reporting no and not very much debt stress. DISCUSSION: Reverse mortgage debt causes a complex stress response. Stress per dollar of debt is lower for reverse than standard mortgages 4 years after origination. However, reverse mortgages' loan balance grows over time causing total stress to increase, while stress from a standard mortgage decreases as it is repaid. If an older adult uses reverse mortgage funds to repay consumer debt then total stress is reduced.

The Relationship Between Reverse Mortgage Borrowing, Domain and Life Satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: Reverse mortgages allow adults aged 62 years and older to borrow against the equity in their homes without incurring monthly loan repayments. This study examines the relationship of reverse mortgage borrowing with older adults' satisfaction with their financial situation, housing, health, and daily life/leisure as well as with life as a whole. METHOD: A new national data set of 1,088 older adults, comprised of loan data, credit histories, and responses to a phone survey, was created. Our estimation strategy compares reverse mortgage borrowers to older adults who obtained mandatory counseling but not a reverse mortgage. RESULTS: Reverse mortgage borrowers have significantly higher financial and housing satisfaction compared to nonborrowers; no differences were found for health, daily life/leisure, and general satisfaction. These satisfaction domains contribute differently to general satisfaction for reverse mortgage borrowers relative to nonborrowers: housing satisfaction has a greater influence for borrowers and health a greater influence for nonborrowers. DISCUSSION: Our study provides new knowledge about the longer-term outcomes of reverse mortgage borrowers. The positive association of reverse mortgage borrowing for housing and financial satisfaction and, in turn, general satisfaction, provides insights regarding borrower experiences with this controversial financial tool.